There are various ways you can control
Requires Free Membership to View
SearchMidmarketSecurity.com members gain immediate and unlimited access to breaking SMB industry news, virus alerts, new hacker threats, highly focused security newsletters, and more -- all at no cost. Join me on SearchMidmarketSecurity.com today!
Michael S. Mimoso, Editorial DirectorUnfortunately, Cisco does not have anything comparable to Microsoft's patch management tools, so your routers and firewalls are going to require a manual installation. Even if you use a patch management tool on your Windows systems, you will still need to manually test any new patches before rolling them out across several machines. Testing before deployment is a major roadblock to full automation, and an automated patch deployment should only be considered for systems where information confidentiality is more important than availability, or where the risk of an attack is deemed to outweigh the risk of downtime. Another related problem with patch management tools is that they are inclined to approach patches as just another file distribution task. Because this is so, they tend to lack patch analysis capabilities and an understanding of patch interrelationships.
There are several patch management tools for Windows, including products from Configuresoft, PatchLink, St. Bernard Software, Ecora, BigFix and Shavlik Technologies. Shavlick developed the HFNetChk™ scanning engine that's used by Microsoft's Baseline Security Analyzer. There is a Basic Edition of their HFNetChkPro that is aimed at smaller organizations that do not need advanced patch management functions, such as scheduled scans and e-mail support. More information can be found at their site http://www.shavlik.com/hfnetchk-windows.aspx.
This was first published in February 2009